[Prev][Next][Index]
Re: SgFunctionSymb::numberOfParameters returns bogus value
- To: bfatyga@slab.extreme.indiana.edu
- Cc: Lars Thomas Hansen <lth@skinner.cs.uoregon.edu>,
sage-bugs@rainier.extreme.indiana.edu
- Subject: Re: SgFunctionSymb::numberOfParameters returns bogus value
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 1995 15:17:30 PST."
<9503302020.AA12092@skinner.cs.uoregon.edu>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:53:45 -0800
- From: Lars Thomas Hansen <lth@skinner.cs.uoregon.edu>
- Sender: owner-sage-bugs@extreme.indiana.edu
>Could you run dumpdep again and compare symbol table entries for
> Processor_Main
>before and after the instrumentation?
>In particular, check out the field called in_l
>it should be
>
>in_l= ----
>in both cases, but I suspect that it becomes something else after
>instrumentation.
And you are right:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE INSTRUMENTATION:
630-S 509 9-T 0 ---- 1-B Processor_Main n_in= 0 n_out= 0 n_io= 0
in_l= ---- out_l= ---- sy_l= ---- p_hdr= 254-B FUNCTION_NAME
AFTER INSTRUMENTATION:
653-S 509 9-T 0 655-S 1-B Processor_Main n_in= 0 n_out= 0 n_io= 0
in_l= 654-S out_l= ---- sy_l= ---- p_hdr= 274-B FUNCTION_NAME
654-S 503 527-T 0 ---- 274-B pcxx_P local= 0 nxt_in= ---- nxt_out= ---- VARIABLE_NAME
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the in_l field, anyway?
--lars